The God Delusion Debate: Richard Dawkins Vs John Lennox
Fixed Point Foundation
Open iTunes to preview, buy, and download music.
| Name | Artist | Time | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Opening Statements | Fixed Point Foundation | 18:32 | Album Only | View In iTunes |
|
2 |
Theses 1 And 2 | Fixed Point Foundation | 24:24 | Album Only | View In iTunes |
|
3 |
Theses 3 And 4 | Fixed Point Foundation | 33:15 | Album Only | View In iTunes |
|
4 |
Theses 5 And 6 | Fixed Point Foundation | 19:26 | Album Only | View In iTunes |
|
5 |
Concluding Remarks | Fixed Point Foundation | 7:22 | $0.99 | View In iTunes |
| Total: 5 Songs |
Customer Reviews
ridiculous non-debate
this is an incredibly slanted discussion organized by a group (openly) dedicated to the cause of backing Christianity against "new atheism." It's a ludicrous discussion, which basically involves Richard Dawkins being asked to further explain a quote from his book followed by a sermon from Lennox. Richard Dawkins is frequently begging to counter Lennox's pre-prepared speeches.
It's disgusting. This is NOT a debate, and despite the slant and Lennox's prepared pontification, he still sounds like a complete moron on this topic. HIs arguments are cheap and transparently empowered by the format of this debate... for instance, he prepares a statement excusing Christianity for the crusades, right before he'll attack atheists for Stalin. It's outrageous that he then gets to go along speaking without allowing Dawkins a counterpoint is frustrating to anyone looking for a real debate here.
How can Richard Dawkins keep denying
This was one of three debates he had with John Lennox. He lost all three debates and now says John Lennox is not worthy of a debate. Also he won't debate William Lane Craig only for as some else mention for fear of looking foolish. If he does that, he might not be able to sell as many books. The burden of proof is always on the atheist side. Dawkins wasn't able to defend his position because it is in evidently indefensible. God exists. Do some research and you will find Him too.
What a waste of time
Totally slanted and unfair trying to make Dawkins look foolish when the truth is Dawkins is backed by science.
It just goes to show the argument for God is so weak that they need to cheat.. Believers who have been brainwashed into believing just don't want to see the truth when it is right there..
An invisible super creature that cannot even show himself? Really? It is all just so far fetched... Yeah, 6,000 years ago I can see believing but today? Wake up people!








