iTunes

Opening the iTunes Store.If iTunes doesn’t open, click the iTunes icon in your Dock or on your Windows desktop.Progress Indicator
Opening the iBooks Store.If iBooks doesn't open, click the iBooks app in your Dock.Progress Indicator
iTunes

iTunes is the world's easiest way to organize and add to your digital media collection.

We are unable to find iTunes on your computer. To download from the iTunes Store, get iTunes now.

Do you already have iTunes? Click I Have iTunes to open it now.

I Have iTunes Free Download
iTunes for Mac + PC

Olympic Games are an International Farce': The 1920 Antwerp Games and the Question of Great Britain's Participation (Essay)

Olympika: The International Journal of Olympic Studies 2008, Annual, 17

Olympika: The International Journal of Olympic Studies

This book is available for download with iBooks on your Mac or iOS device, and with iTunes on your computer. Books can be read with iBooks on your Mac or iOS device.

Description

On July 6, 2005 the International Olympic Committee (IOC) awarded the 2012 summer Olympic Games to the city of London. In defeating a highly favored Paris bid, the British capital realized the unrivaled prospect of hosting the summer games for the third time since Baron Pierre de Coubertin's 1894 revival of the Olympic movement. Reflecting on the IOC's decision, former Prime Minister Tony Blair described London's nomination as a "momentous day" for Great Britain. (1) London bid leader and former Olympic gold medalist Sebastian Coe reiterated Blair's message, expressing his joy that Britain had captured "the biggest prize in sport," the Olympic Games. (2) The euphoria that surrounded the IOC's decision creates the impression that the Olympic Games, like the World Cup in soccer, are central to the aspirations of British sport. Upon closer inspection, however, British affinity for the Olympic Movement appears to be a very recent phenomenon. In fact, history reveals that Olympism (3) held an extremely tenuous position in Great Britain throughout the formative years of modern Olympic competition. The nation's apathy emerged most clearly during the 1920 Olympic Games, organized in haste and held in the war-torn city of Antwerp, Belgium. (4) When the guns stopped firing on November 11, 1918, Pierre de Coubertin and the IOC turned their immediate attentions towards reviving the modern Olympic movement. In recognition of Belgium's bravery during the Great War, the IOC awarded the Games of the VIIth Olympiad to Antwerp at a meeting on April 5, 1919, in Lausanne, Switzerland, the new administrative home of the Olympic movement. For Coubertin, the choice of Antwerp, a city recently liberated from German occupation and oppression, provided an ideal setting for the first postwar games. (5) The Reverend Robert S. de Courcy Laffan, vice-chairman of the British Olympic Association (BOA) and a "noble ally" of Coubertin, pledged his unwavering support to the IOC's decision to revive the cycle of modern Olympic Games. (6) Writing in the Times on April 14, 1919, Laffan, a chaplain to the British Forces during the Great War, made a patriotic appeal to the British public. Even though the "time is short and the difficulties are great," Laffan admitted, Britain must show "their gratitude and admiration towards the heroic Belgian people by doing their utmost to make the Olympic Games of Antwerp a signal and convincing success." (7)

Olympic Games are an International Farce': The 1920 Antwerp Games and the Question of Great Britain's Participation (Essay)
View In iTunes
  • 2,99 €
  • Available on iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, and Mac.
  • Category: Sports & Outdoors
  • Published: 01 January 2008
  • Publisher: International Centre for Olympic Studies
  • Print Length: 55 Pages
  • Language: English
  • Requirements: To view this book, you must have an iOS device with iBooks 1.3.1 or later and iOS 4.3.3 or later, or a Mac with iBooks 1.0 or later and OS X 10.9 or later.

Customer Ratings

We have not received enough ratings to display an average for this book.