Richard W. Campbell and Harold T. Collins v. Gladys B. Campbell

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge. The guardian ad litem's motion for rehearing1{/Cite} claims that our determination that extrinsic evidence is admissible in the case of a so-called patent ambiguity in a will, and is not confined to resolving a latent ambiguity, is totally at variance with the settled law of Florida. We disagree.