Campbell v. Regents of the University of California Campbell v. Regents of the University of California

Campbell v. Regents of the University of California

106 P.3D 976, 35 CAL.4TH 311, 25 CAL.RPTR.3D 320, 2005 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 2708, 22 IER CASES 905, 195 ED. LAW REP. 989, 05 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 2016, 5 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 2016, 2005.CA.0002025

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

In this action, we address whether an employee of the Regents of the University of California (the Regents) must exhaust university internal administrative remedies before filing suit in superior court for retaliatory termination under either Government Code section 12653, subdivision (c), or Labor Code section 1102.5, sometimes called the "whistleblower" statutes. We conclude the exhaustion rule requires university employees to exhaust university administrative remedies before proceeding to suit. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2005
7 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
94.2
KB

More Books by Colorado Supreme Court

Big Top, Inc. v. Schooley Big Top, Inc. v. Schooley
1962
People v. Newman People v. Newman
1996
People v. Rotenberg People v. Rotenberg
1996
People v. Murray People v. Murray
1996
Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver
2001
In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction
2001