State v. Komorowski

1 Claude Amil Komorowski appeals from a judgment, entered upon a jurys verdicts, convicting him of five felony offenses. He also appeals from an order denying his post-conviction motion. He claims that the verdicts should be set aside because his trial counsel performed ineffectively during the plea bargaining process by failing to convey an offer from the State to resolve the case short of trial. Because the record supports the circuit courts conclusion that the State did not extend the alleged offer, we affirm.