F. Warren Hurst and Carmand Normand v. F. Warren Hurst and Carmand Normand v.

F. Warren Hurst and Carmand Normand v‪.‬

DE.434 , 583 A.2d 1334 (1990)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

The plaintiffs, who hold common shares of Asbestos Corporation Limited, a Canadian corporation, ("ACL"), bring this action
individually and on behalf of a class of ACL shareholders allegedly injured by certain transactions that occurred between
1982 and 1986, and were related to the acquisition of ACL's corporate parent by the Province of Quebec. The plaintiffs need
as defendants General Dynamics Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("General Dynamics"), and three of its directors. The parties
later stipulated to the dismissal, without prejudice, of the individual defendants. On May 10, 1988, General Dynamics moved
to dismiss or stay this Delaware action, on forum non conveniens grounds, in favor of certain proceedings pending in Canada.
On July 12, 1988, General Dynamics moved to impose Rule 11 sanctions upon the plaintiffs, based upon certain inaccurate statements
made in the plaintiffs' answering brief on the motion to dismiss or stay. There were two oral arguments on these motions, the first on March 7, 1989, and the second, after the filing of supplemental
briefs, on March 6, 1990. This is the decision on those motions.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1990
11 May
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
21
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
71.8
KB

More Books by New Castle Court of Chancery of Delaware

Maxxam v. Maxxam Maxxam v. Maxxam
1996
Agnes Carvel and Pamela Carvel v. Andreas Agnes Carvel and Pamela Carvel v. Andreas
1995
Melvyn Zupnick v. Roberto C. Goizueta Melvyn Zupnick v. Roberto C. Goizueta
1997
Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. Wheelabrator Technologies Inc.
1995
Pathmark Stores v. 3821 Associates Pathmark Stores v. 3821 Associates
1995
Eugene D. Gagliardi v. Trifoods Eugene D. Gagliardi v. Trifoods
1996