Cindy Law v. Superior Court
755 P.2D 1130, 157 ARIZ. 142, 1986.AZ.40139
Arizona Court of Appeals
This book is available for download with iBooks on your Mac or iOS device, and with iTunes on your computer. Books can be read with iBooks on your Mac or iOS device.
We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 4, Ariz.R.P.Sp.Act. and Ariz. Const. art. 6, Â§ 5 because, absent judicial intervention, the City is ready to execute a trade and leaseback agreement with GDC, and GDC is ready to begin construction. Petitioners had no equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal because any delay would result in irreparable injury to the desert land. In addition, this is a matter of great public interest and concern. See, e.g., King v. Superior Court, 138 Ariz. 147, 149-50, 673 P.2d 787, 789-90 (1983).
- Category: Law
- Published: Sep 04, 1986
- Publisher: LawApp Publishers
- Seller: Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
- Print Length: 12 Pages
- Language: English