Marin General Hospital v. Modesto & Empire Traction Co. Marin General Hospital v. Modesto & Empire Traction Co.

Marin General Hospital v. Modesto & Empire Traction Co‪.‬

581 F.3D 941, 2009 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 13,557, 47 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CAS. 2310, 09 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 11,750, 09 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 11,672, 2009.C09.0003937

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

We consider in this case whether § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), completely preempts a state-law action for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, quantum meruit and estoppel. Because the state-law claims could not be pursued under § 502(a)(1)(B), and because they rely on legal duties that are independent from duties under any benefit plan established under ERISA, we hold that they are not completely preempted. Because the claims are not completely preempted under § 502(a)(1)(B), there is no federal question subject matter jurisdiction in federal court. Removal from state court was therefore improper.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2009
September 10
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
20
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
89.7
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Cornelius Singleton (Re Cornelius Ex Parte Cornelius Singleton (Re Cornelius
1985
State Alabama and George C. Wallace As State Alabama and George C. Wallace As
1975
John Lewis Mcphearson v. State Alabama John Lewis Mcphearson v. State Alabama
1960
George C. Wallace v. Board Education George C. Wallace v. Board Education
1967
Peggy Ostell Goldin v. State Alabama Peggy Ostell Goldin v. State Alabama
1961
Johnny Daniel Beecher v. State Alabama Johnny Daniel Beecher v. State Alabama
1966