[U] Parkland Plaza Veterinary Clinic Sc V. Gerard

¶1 Anne Gerard appeals from an order affirming the court commissioner's dismissal with prejudice and on the merits rendered in her favor. That order dismissed a small claims action by which Parkland Plaza Veterinary Clinic SC attempted to collect payment allegedly owed to it by Gerard. Parkland ultimately moved to dismiss with prejudice and the court so ordered. As best we can tell, Gerard contends that the matter should not have been dismissed because arguments she raised before the court commissioner were never satisfactorily addressed. Gerard never conceded that the small claims court had jurisdiction. While maintaining that argument, Gerard also demanded that Parkland comply with her discovery requests. Gerard seeks sanctions against Parkland and the trial court, compensatory damages and costs, and punitive damages from Parkland, Parkland's attorney, and the trial court. We ascertain nothing in the record or from the arguments of the parties that would support such relief. Furthermore, we observe that Gerard obtained a favorable ruling in the circuit court; moreover, nothing in the order is left unresolved or could be interpreted as against Gerard's interest. We affirm the order.