The Dave Bowman Show Dave Bowman

In the intriguing world of naval history and maritime technology, few things capture the imagination quite like the evolution of the submarine. In a special episode of "Bill Mick Live" on April 9, 2024, Dave Bowman, a seasoned historian and submarine veteran, dives deep into the legacy of submarines, from their early inception to their critical role in modern naval warfare. With his unique blend of firsthand experience and historical knowledge, Dave navigates through the stories of innovation, bravery, and tragedy that have defined submarine service. This episode not only sheds light on the technological advancements and strategic significance of submarines but also honors the memory of those who served beneath the waves, facing the ocean's unforgiving nature. Join us for a journey through time, exploring the depths of human ingenuity and the relentless spirit of exploration that characterizes the submariners' path.


---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/plausibly-live/message

In the latest episode of “What The Frock,” listeners were treated to the unique banter and insightful discussions that have become the hallmark of this engaging podcast. Hosted by the dynamic duo of Rabbi Dave and Friar Rod, this episode once again proved why this podcast has captured the hearts and minds of its audience.

The episode kicks off with Rabbi Dave’s playful teasing of Friar Rod’s choice of headwear, setting the tone for an episode filled with humor, candid observations, and a touch of irreverence. The duo briefly delved into their shared interest in the Sacramento River Cats baseball team, hinting at the personal quirks and interests that enrich their on-air chemistry.

Rabbi Dave and Friar Rod then embarked on a historical journey, recounting the intriguing tale of Christopher Columbus in Jamaica during 1501. They used this story to explore themes of power, persuasion, and the unexpected impact of natural phenomena, such as eclipses, on human history. This narrative not only showcased the hosts’ knack for storytelling but also illuminated lesser-known facets of history, engaging listeners with a blend of education and entertainment.

The conversation took a contemporary turn with discussions on current events, including state responses to upcoming eclipses and potential overreactions fueled by conspiracy theories. This segment highlighted the podcast’s ability to pivot from historical anecdotes to modern-day absurdities, weaving together a tapestry of topics that keeps the listener hooked.

Throughout the episode, Rabbi Dave and Friar Rod maintained a delicate balance between humor and seriousness, effortlessly transitioning from lighthearted banter to thoughtful commentary on social issues and historical events. Their dynamic rapport and the seamless flow of conversation underscored the podcast’s appeal: a blend of entertainment, education, and enlightenment.

As the episode drew to a close, the hosts touched on their personal lives and upcoming plans, reminding listeners of the genuine connection and camaraderie that underpins “What The Frock.” This blend of personal anecdotes with broader cultural and historical discussions encapsulates the essence of the podcast: a platform where diverse topics converge, presented by hosts who are as insightful as they are entertaining.

In summary, this episode of “What The Frock” is a testament to the unique charm and intellectual curiosity that Rabbi Dave and Friar Rod bring to the airwaves. With a mix of humor, history, and heartfelt discussions, they continue to offer a podcast that is not only enjoyable but thought-provoking, inviting listeners to explore the world through their distinctive lens.






---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/plausibly-live/message

On the evening of April 2, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson stood before an excited Congress and Gallery, and asked that the nation declare war on Imperial Germany. In a strange way, this was the penultimate Wilson moment. He would ask – already knowing the answer – the nation to follow his leadership into a war to make the world safe for democracy.

We are told that he had spent the night before in a small office of the east Wing, pouring out his soul to a friend who also happened to be a newspaper reporter. He was terrified for the nation, that he believed that he war would destroy the United States as a free nation. That the Constitution would be shredded to pieces and the very freedoms on which it had been founded and stood would be erased.

Standing before Congress, and the nation, he showed no signs of such concerns or fears. To thunderous applause and joyous acclaim, he would tell the Congress that “We are the champions of the rights of mankind.” The nation would rally behind his words and go “over there.” There would be some resistance, but in the end, it was his vision and his call for action that sent things forward. Or… was it his vision? 

In any case, almost half a million American would never come home.

LINKS

What Price Glory (1926 – Full Film)

What Price Glory (1957 Full Film)

Phillip Dru: Administrator (Full book)






---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/plausibly-live/message

What if… we had a President who disagreed with Congress on everything? And when I say, “everything,” I mean… “everything?” What if the Congress passed a law that was so important to the national development of our society that it was deemed in many places, and a “new birth of freedom,” and the President, vetoed it? What would the reaction be? If this were to happen, how would it change the course of the nation? What would be the result of a direct conflict between the power and authority of the executive and the power of Congress to make law?

And… if this were to ever happen, what could Congress do to make sure that the President couldn’t even try to do it again?

This week on Dave Does History on Bill Mick Live, we’re going to take a look into one of the most controversial acts of the Reconstruction era: President Andrew Johnson’s veto of the 1866 Civil Rights Act.

In the aftermath of the Civil War, the United States found itself at a crossroads, grappling with the challenges of reintegrating the Southern states and defining the status of freed slaves. It was a time of bold ideas, fierce debates, and monumental legislation that aimed to redefine the fabric of American society.

The Civil Rights Act of 1866 emerged as a cornerstone, promising to grant African Americans the rights of citizenship denied to them for centuries. However, it faced opposition from an unexpected quarter: the President of the United States. Andrew Johnson, who ascended to the presidency after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, vetoed the Act, setting the stage for a historic clash with Congress.

Why did Johnson veto this groundbreaking legislation? What were the implications of his actions, both immediate and long-term? And how did Congress respond? In this episode we will explore these questions and more, shedding light on a tumultuous period in American history that continues to resonate today.


---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/plausibly-live/message

Many people say that they “hate” Daylight Savings Time. Is that actually the case? Or is what they actually hate the twice a year fiddling with digital clocks in their cars?

So it was that on March 19, 1918, the United States enacted the Standard Time Act, much of which remains on our law books today. But, was it just a war measure designed to held beat the Huns? Or was it a vast conspiracy by US Farmers to… to… to… well… to do something that would benefit their business at the expense of your sleep? Did it actually help anything in 1974 when the energy crises hit? Did it actually “save” anything? Did it help to win the war? And why exactly do people blame Benjamin Franklin for this?

Let’s stop getting our history from Nicholas Cage flicks and see if we can figure out why Daylight Savings Time is still a thing…


---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/plausibly-live/message

One of the least discussed and acknowledged periods in US History got its start on March 11, 1880, with the birth of the man, Harry L. Laughlin, who would be among the driving figures in the eugenics movement in the United States. The ideas for which he would advocate included sterilization and would not actually end until well into the 1970s. It all sounds good on the surface – to improve humans through genetics.

Today we tend to think of these ideas as the stuff of Nazi history and dystopian science fiction. The hard realization though is that these ideas – that we can eliminate undesirable genetic traits from the gene pool, like many ideas, was a European invention that was snagged onto and improved upon by American idealists. And if you thought that it would be stopped by high minded ideals found in the Constitution, you will be surprised to learn that the Supreme court not only supported and upheld these ideas, but once quipped that “three generations of imbeciles is enough…“






---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/plausibly-live/message